DeWarmte Pomp MP vs M-TEC AHPC412
SCOP (35 °C): DeWarmte Pomp MP 5.05, M-TEC AHPC412 4.74. The DeWarmte Pomp MP is better on 10 of 14 comparable points.
Who wins where
- DeWarmte Pomp MP
- M-TEC AHPC412
Biggest differences
| Fact | Pomp MP | AHPC412 |
|---|---|---|
| COP A7/W35 | 6.44 | 4.53 |
| COP A2/W35 | 5.03 | 3.75 |
| ISDE grant (NL) | 3,250 € | 2,825 € |
| Rated output 55 °C | 8.76 kW | 9.93 kW |
| Outdoor unit sound power | 53 dB(A) | 60 dB(A) |
| SCOP (35 °C) | 5.05 | 4.74 |
Score per area = position (0–100) relative to all 1350 models in this category; higher is better.
| Technical specifications | DeWarmtePomp MP | M-TECAHPC412 |
|---|---|---|
| Grants & market | ||
| Boiler Upgrade Scheme | £7,500 – £9,000 | £7,500 – £9,000 |
| General | ||
| Type (source) | Air-to-water 1 | Air-to-water 1 |
| Performance | ||
| Rated output 35 °C | 9.91 kW ✓ 1 | 9.87 kW 1 |
| Rated output 55 °C | 8.76 kW 1 | 9.93 kW ✓ 1 |
| Efficiency | ||
| SCOP (35 °C) | 5.05 ✓ 1 | 4.74 1 |
| SCOP (55 °C) | 3.83 ✓ 1 | 3.7 1 |
| Seasonal efficiency ηs 35 °C | 199 % ✓ 1 | 186.8 % 1 |
| Seasonal efficiency ηs 55 °C | 150 % ✓ 1 | 145 % 1 |
| COP A7/W35 | 6.44 ✓ 1 | 4.53 1 |
| COP A2/W35 | 5.03 ✓ 1 | 3.75 1 |
| COP A-7/W35 | 3.17 1 | 3.28 ✓ 1 |
| Noise | ||
| Outdoor unit sound power | 53 dB(A) ✓ 1 | 60 dB(A) 1 |
| Refrigerant | ||
| Refrigerant | R290 1 | R290 1 |
| Refrigerant GWP | 3 2 | 3 2 |
| Refrigerant charge | 1 kg ✓ 1 | 1.05 kg 1 |
| Electrical | ||
| Max. power input | 3.6 kW 1 | 7.1 kW 1 |
| Connectivity & smart | ||
| SG Ready | Yes 1 | Yes 1 |
| Grants & market | ||
| ISDE grant (NL) | 3,250 € ✓ 2 | 2,825 € 2 |
Sources
- List of eligible heat pumps (BEG) — Bundesamt für Wirtschaft und Ausfuhrkontrolle (BAFA) · accessed 27 Sept 2026
- ISDE heat pump notification code list — Rijksdienst voor Ondernemend Nederland (RVO) · accessed 28 Sept 2026