DeWarmte Pomp MP vs Quatt HeatPump
SCOP (35 °C): DeWarmte Pomp MP 5.05, Quatt HeatPump 4.93. The DeWarmte Pomp MP is better on 6 of 7 comparable points.
Last updated: + Add a model
Both models in detail
Who wins where
- DeWarmte Pomp MP
- Quatt HeatPump
Biggest differences
| Fact | Pomp MP | HeatPump |
|---|---|---|
| Refrigerant charge | 1 kg | 0.48 kg |
| COP A7/W35 | 6.44 | 4.9 |
| COP A2/W35 | 5.03 | 4 |
| COP A-7/W35 | 3.17 | 2.7 |
| Outdoor unit sound power | 53 dB(A) | 58 dB(A) |
| SCOP (35 °C) | 5.05 | 4.93 |
Score per area = position (0–100) relative to all 1350 models in this category; higher is better.
| Technical specifications | DeWarmtePomp MP | QuattHeatPump |
|---|---|---|
| Grants & market | ||
| Boiler Upgrade Scheme | £7,500 – £9,000 | £7,500 – £9,000 |
| General | ||
| Type (source) | Air-to-water1 | – |
| Performance | ||
| Heating capacity (A7/W35) | – | 5.4 kW2 |
| Rated output 35 °C | 10 kW3 | – |
| Rated output 55 °C | 9 kW3 | – |
| Max. flow temperature | – | 70 °C2 |
| Min. outdoor temperature | – | -25 °C2 |
| Efficiency | ||
| SCOP (35 °C) | 5.05✓3 | 4.932 |
| SCOP (55 °C) | 3.83✓3 | 3.822 |
| Seasonal efficiency ηs 35 °C | 199 %3 | – |
| Seasonal efficiency ηs 55 °C | 150 %3 | – |
| Energy label 35 °C | A+++3 | A+++2 |
| Energy label 55 °C | A+++3 | A+++2 |
| COP A7/W35 | 6.44✓1 | 4.92 |
| COP A2/W35 | 5.03✓1 | 42 |
| COP A-7/W35 | 3.17✓1 | 2.72 |
| Noise | ||
| Outdoor unit sound power | 53 dB(A)✓3 | 58 dB(A)2 |
| Refrigerant | ||
| Refrigerant | R2901 | R2902 |
| Refrigerant GWP | 34 | – |
| Refrigerant charge | 1 kg1 | 0.48 kg✓2 |
| Electrical | ||
| Max. power input | 3.6 kW1 | – |
| Connectivity & smart | ||
| SG Ready | Yes1 | – |
| Dimensions & weight | ||
| Weight | – | 82.5 kg2 |
| Grants & market | ||
| ISDE grant (NL) | 3,250 €4 | – |
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the DeWarmte Pomp MP or the Quatt HeatPump?
SCOP (35 °C): DeWarmte Pomp MP 5.05, Quatt HeatPump 4.93. The DeWarmte Pomp MP is better on 6 of 7 comparable points.
What is the SCOP (35 °C) of the DeWarmte Pomp MP and the Quatt HeatPump?
DeWarmte Pomp MP: 5.05. Quatt HeatPump: 4.93.
Which is better on refrigerant charge: the DeWarmte Pomp MP or the Quatt HeatPump?
Quatt HeatPump: 0.48 kg. DeWarmte Pomp MP: 1 kg.
Which is better on COP A7/W35: the DeWarmte Pomp MP or the Quatt HeatPump?
DeWarmte Pomp MP: 6.44. Quatt HeatPump: 4.9.
Related comparisons
How we collect and check this data →
Sources
- List of eligible heat pumps (BEG) — Bundesamt für Wirtschaft und Ausfuhrkontrolle (BAFA) · accessed 27 Sept 2026
- Quatt HeatPump – technische specificaties, v1.3 — Quatt B.V. · accessed 27 Sept 2026
- European Product Registry for Energy Labelling (EPREL) – heat pumps — Europese Commissie · accessed 15 Oct 2026
- ISDE heat pump notification code list — Rijksdienst voor Ondernemend Nederland (RVO) · accessed 25 Oct 2026