Baetulenn [BLCCVE300G] BAELUC B10 300L vs RHOSS TWCTZ-B 300
Water heating efficiency ηwh: Baetulenn [BLCCVE300G] BAELUC B10 300L 166 %, RHOSS TWCTZ-B 300 131 %. The Baetulenn [BLCCVE300G] BAELUC B10 300L is better on 6 of 7 comparable points.
Last updated: + Add a model
Both models in detail
Who wins where
- Baetulenn [BLCCVE300G] BAELUC B10 300L
- RHOSS TWCTZ-B 300
Biggest differences
| Fact | [BLCCVE300G] BAELUC B10 300L | TWCTZ-B 300 |
|---|---|---|
| ηwh, colder climate | 166 % | 123 % |
| Annual electricity use, colder climate | 1,009 kWh | 1,360 kWh |
| Water heating efficiency ηwh | 166 % | 131 % |
| Annual electricity use, warmer climate | 1,009 kWh | 1,133 kWh |
| ηwh, warmer climate | 166 % | 148 % |
| Indoor sound power | 52 dB(A) | 55 dB(A) |
Score per area = position (0–100) relative to all 450 models in this category; higher is better.
| Technical specifications | Baetulenn[BLCCVE300G] BAELUC B10 300L | RHOSSTWCTZ-B 300 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Load profile | XL1 | XL2 |
| Efficiency | ||
| Water heating efficiency ηwh | 166 %✓1 | 131 %2 |
| ηwh, colder climate | 166 %✓1 | 123 %2 |
| ηwh, warmer climate | 166 %✓1 | 148 %2 |
| Energy label | A+1 | A+2 |
| Annual electricity use, colder climate | 1,009 kWh✓1 | 1,360 kWh2 |
| Annual electricity use, warmer climate | 1,009 kWh✓1 | 1,133 kWh2 |
| Noise | ||
| Indoor sound power | 52 dB(A)✓1 | 55 dB(A)2 |
| Outdoor sound power | 52 dB(A)1 | – |
| Connectivity & smart | ||
| Smart control | Yes1 | Yes2 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Baetulenn [BLCCVE300G] BAELUC B10 300L or the RHOSS TWCTZ-B 300?
Water heating efficiency ηwh: Baetulenn [BLCCVE300G] BAELUC B10 300L 166 %, RHOSS TWCTZ-B 300 131 %. The Baetulenn [BLCCVE300G] BAELUC B10 300L is better on 6 of 7 comparable points.
What is the water heating efficiency ηwh of the Baetulenn [BLCCVE300G] BAELUC B10 300L and the RHOSS TWCTZ-B 300?
Baetulenn [BLCCVE300G] BAELUC B10 300L: 166 %. RHOSS TWCTZ-B 300: 131 %.
Which is better on ηwh, colder climate: the Baetulenn [BLCCVE300G] BAELUC B10 300L or the RHOSS TWCTZ-B 300?
Baetulenn [BLCCVE300G] BAELUC B10 300L: 166 %. RHOSS TWCTZ-B 300: 123 %.
Which is better on annual electricity use, colder climate: the Baetulenn [BLCCVE300G] BAELUC B10 300L or the RHOSS TWCTZ-B 300?
Baetulenn [BLCCVE300G] BAELUC B10 300L: 1,009 kWh. RHOSS TWCTZ-B 300: 1,360 kWh.
Related comparisons
- Baetulenn[BLCCVE300G] BAELUC B10 300LvsBosch7738340429
- Baetulenn[BLCCVE300G] BAELUC B10 300LvsBuderus7738340434
- Baetulenn[BLCCVE300G] BAELUC B10 300LvsCABEL986152
- Baetulenn[BLCCVE300G] BAELUC B10 300LvsIndolEcoSave PV300
- Baetulenn[BLCCVE300G] BAELUC B10 300LvsIndolW381A+
- Baetulenn[BLCCVE300G] BAELUC B10 300LvsMigloorPAVH-15V4FBA
How we collect and check this data →
Sources
- European Product Registry for Energy Labelling (EPREL) – water heaters — Europese Commissie · accessed Oct 13, 2026
- European Product Registry for Energy Labelling (EPREL) – water heaters — Europese Commissie · accessed Oct 13, 2026