versusindex
MT
Heat pump water heaters · Compare

AERMEC SWP301 vs Climer EH200P 444

Water heating efficiency ηwh: AERMEC SWP301 124 %, Climer EH200P 444 123 %. The Climer EH200P 444 is better on 4 of 7 comparable points.

Last updated: + Add a model

Who wins where

  • AERMEC SWP301
  • Climer EH200P 444

Biggest differences

FactSWP301EH200P 444
Annual electricity use, colder climate826 kWh1,094 kWh
ηwh, colder climate124 %94 %
Outdoor sound power60 dB(A)53 dB(A)
Indoor sound power60 dB(A)55 dB(A)
Annual electricity use, warmer climate826 kWh806 kWh
ηwh, warmer climate124 %127 %
All specifications ↓

Score per area = position (0–100) relative to all 450 models in this category; higher is better.

AERMECSWP301ClimerEH200P 444
General
Load profileL1L2
Efficiency
Water heating efficiency ηwh124 %✓1123 %2
ηwh, colder climate124 %✓194 %2
ηwh, warmer climate124 %1127 %✓2
Energy labelA+1A+2
Annual electricity use, colder climate826 kWh✓11,094 kWh2
Annual electricity use, warmer climate826 kWh1806 kWh✓2
Noise
Indoor sound power60 dB(A)155 dB(A)✓2
Outdoor sound power60 dB(A)153 dB(A)✓2

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the AERMEC SWP301 or the Climer EH200P 444?

Water heating efficiency ηwh: AERMEC SWP301 124 %, Climer EH200P 444 123 %. The Climer EH200P 444 is better on 4 of 7 comparable points.

What is the water heating efficiency ηwh of the AERMEC SWP301 and the Climer EH200P 444?

AERMEC SWP301: 124 %. Climer EH200P 444: 123 %.

Which is better on annual electricity use, colder climate: the AERMEC SWP301 or the Climer EH200P 444?

AERMEC SWP301: 826 kWh. Climer EH200P 444: 1,094 kWh.

Which is better on ηwh, colder climate: the AERMEC SWP301 or the Climer EH200P 444?

AERMEC SWP301: 124 %. Climer EH200P 444: 94 %.

How we collect and check this data →

Sources

  1. European Product Registry for Energy Labelling (EPREL) – water heaters — Europese Commissie · accessed 13 Oct 2026
  2. European Product Registry for Energy Labelling (EPREL) – water heaters — Europese Commissie · accessed 13 Oct 2026