EcoFlow STREAM Pro vs SolaX T-BAT H 3.0
Usable capacity: EcoFlow STREAM Pro –, SolaX T-BAT H 3.0 2.8 kWh. The SolaX T-BAT H 3.0 is better on 4 of 6 comparable points.
Who wins where
- EcoFlow STREAM Pro
- SolaX T-BAT H 3.0
Biggest differences
| Fact | STREAM Pro | T-BAT H 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Charge power (continuous) | 1.05 kW | 2.5 kW |
| Discharge power (continuous) | 1.2 kW | 2.5 kW |
| Nominal capacity | 1.92 kWh | 3.1 kWh |
| Min. operating temperature | -20 °C | -30 °C |
Score per area = position (0–100) relative to all 130 models in this category; higher is better.
| Technical specifications | EcoFlowSTREAM Pro | SolaXT-BAT H 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Cell chemistry | LFP 1 | LFP 2 |
| Smart charging on dynamic prices | Yes 1 | – |
| Wi-Fi / app | Yes 1 | – |
| Performance | ||
| Usable capacity | – | 2.8 kWh 2 |
| Nominal capacity | 1.92 kWh 1 | 3.1 kWh ✓ 2 |
| Expandable up to | 11.52 kWh 1 | – |
| Charge power (continuous) | 1.05 kW 1 | 2.5 kW ✓ 2 |
| Discharge power (continuous) | 1.2 kW 1 | 2.5 kW ✓ 2 |
| Peak power | – | 3.1 kW 2 |
| Efficiency | ||
| Round-trip efficiency | – | 95 % 2 |
| Depth of discharge | – | 90 % 2 |
| Electrical | ||
| Backup power | Yes 1 | – |
| Off-grid capable | Yes 1 | – |
| Dimensions & weight | ||
| IP rating | IP65 1 | IP65 2 |
| Min. operating temperature | -20 °C 1 | -30 °C ✓ 2 |
| Width | 284 mm 1 | – |
| Height | 458 mm 1 | – |
| Depth | 255 mm 1 | – |
| Weight | 22.8 kg 1 | – |
| Warranty & lifespan | ||
| Warranted cycles | 6,000 1 | 6,000 2 |
| Warranty | 10 years 1 | 10 years 2 |
Sources
- EcoFlow STREAM Ultra/Pro Specifications, 1.0 — EcoFlow UK · accessed 29 Sept 2026
- T-BAT H 3.0 V2 Datasheet, V2.6 — SolaX · accessed 29 Sept 2026