DeWarmte Pomp MP vs FoxESS HP3-10P-E
SCOP (35 °C): DeWarmte Pomp MP 5.05, FoxESS HP3-10P-E 5.04. The FoxESS HP3-10P-E is better on 6 of 14 comparable points.
Who wins where
- DeWarmte Pomp MP
- FoxESS HP3-10P-E
Biggest differences
| Fact | Pomp MP | HP3-10P-E |
|---|---|---|
| Refrigerant charge | 1 kg | 1.5 kg |
| Rated output 55 °C | 8.76 kW | 10.01 kW |
| COP A-7/W35 | 3.17 | 2.92 |
| COP A7/W35 | 6.44 | 6.93 |
Score per area = position (0–100) relative to all 1350 models in this category; higher is better.
| Technical specifications | DeWarmtePomp MP | FoxESSHP3-10P-E |
|---|---|---|
| Grants & market | ||
| SEAI Heat Pump System Grant | €14,500 | €14,500 |
| General | ||
| Type (source) | Air-to-water 1 | Air-to-water 1 |
| Performance | ||
| Heating capacity (A7/W35) | – | 9.55 kW 2 |
| Rated output 35 °C | 9.91 kW 1 | 10.02 kW ✓ 1 |
| Rated output 55 °C | 8.76 kW 1 | 10.01 kW ✓ 1 |
| Efficiency | ||
| SCOP (35 °C) | 5.05 ✓ 1 | 5.04 1 |
| SCOP (55 °C) | 3.83 1 | 3.9 ✓ 1 |
| Seasonal efficiency ηs 35 °C | 199 % ✓ 1 | 198 % 1 |
| Seasonal efficiency ηs 55 °C | 150 % 1 | 153 % ✓ 1 |
| Energy label 35 °C | – | A, , , 2 |
| Energy label 55 °C | – | A, , , 2 |
| COP A7/W35 | 6.44 1 | 6.93 ✓ 1 |
| COP A2/W35 | 5.03 ✓ 1 | 4.96 1 |
| COP A-7/W35 | 3.17 ✓ 1 | 2.92 1 |
| Noise | ||
| Outdoor unit sound power | 53 dB(A) 1 | 52 dB(A) ✓ 1 |
| Refrigerant | ||
| Refrigerant | R290 1 | R290 1 |
| Refrigerant GWP | 3 3 | 3 2 |
| Refrigerant charge | 1 kg ✓ 1 | 1.5 kg 1 |
| Electrical | ||
| Max. power input | 3.6 kW 1 | 4.8 kW 1 |
| Connectivity & smart | ||
| SG Ready | Yes 1 | Yes 1 |
| Grants & market | ||
| ISDE grant (NL) | 3,250 € 3 | 3,250 € 3 |
Sources
- List of eligible heat pumps (BEG) — Bundesamt für Wirtschaft und Ausfuhrkontrolle (BAFA) · accessed 27 Sept 2026
- Heat Pump Keymark certificates — EHPA / DIN CERTCO (Heat Pump KEYMARK) · accessed 29 Sept 2026
- ISDE heat pump notification code list — Rijksdienst voor Ondernemend Nederland (RVO) · accessed 27 Sept 2026