CANDY CY-18TAIN/CY-18TAOUT vs Haier AS25S2SJ1FA-3 / AS35S2SJ1FA-3 / 2U50S2SM1FA-3
SEER (cooling): CANDY CY-18TAIN/CY-18TAOUT 6.3, Haier AS25S2SJ1FA-3 / AS35S2SJ1FA-3 / 2U50S2SM1FA-3 8.5. The Haier AS25S2SJ1FA-3 / AS35S2SJ1FA-3 / 2U50S2SM1FA-3 is better on 5 of 7 comparable points.
Who wins where
- CANDY CY-18TAIN/CY-18TAOUT
- Haier AS25S2SJ1FA-3 / AS35S2SJ1FA-3 / 2U50S2SM1FA-3
Biggest differences
| Fact | CY-18TAIN/CY-18TAOUT | AS25S2SJ1FA-3 / AS35S2SJ1FA-3 / 2U50S2SM1FA-3 |
|---|---|---|
| Heating capacity | 2.9 kW | 4 kW |
| SEER (cooling) | 6.3 | 8.5 |
| SCOP (heating) | 4 | 4.6 |
| Indoor unit sound power | 59 dB(A) | 57 dB(A) |
Score per area = position (0–100) relative to all 400 models in this category; higher is better.
| Technical specifications | CANDYCY-18TAIN/CY-18TAOUT | HaierAS25S2SJ1FA-3 / AS35S2SJ1FA-3 / 2U50S2SM1FA-3 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ||
| Cooling capacity | 4.6 kW 1 | 4.6 kW 2 |
| Heating capacity | 2.9 kW 1 | 4 kW ✓ 2 |
| Efficiency | ||
| SEER (cooling) | 6.3 1 | 8.5 ✓ 2 |
| SCOP (heating) | 4 1 | 4.6 ✓ 2 |
| Energy label cooling | A, , 1 | A, , , 2 |
| Energy label heating | A, 1 | A, , 2 |
| Noise | ||
| Indoor unit sound power | 59 dB(A) 1 | 57 dB(A) ✓ 2 |
| Outdoor unit sound power | 64 dB(A) 1 | 63 dB(A) ✓ 2 |
| Refrigerant | ||
| Refrigerant | R32 1 | R32 2 |
| Refrigerant GWP | 675 1 | 675 2 |
Sources
- European Product Registry for Energy Labelling (EPREL) — Europese Commissie · accessed 9 Oct 2026
- European Product Registry for Energy Labelling (EPREL) — Europese Commissie · accessed 9 Oct 2026