Solar panels · Compare

REC Alpha Pure-RX vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27

Peak power: REC Alpha Pure-RX 485 Wp, Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27 445 Wp. The REC Alpha Pure-RX is better on 6 of 10 comparable points.

Who wins where

  • REC Alpha Pure-RX
  • Trina Solar TSM-NEG9RC.27

Biggest differences

FactAlpha Pure-RXTSM-NEG9RC.27
Annual degradation0.25 %0.4 %
Product warranty20 years15 years
Max. snow load7,000 Pa5,400 Pa
Performance warranty25 years30 years
Peak power485 Wp445 Wp
Weight22.7 kg21 kg
All specifications ↓

Score per area = position (0–100) relative to all 3 models in this category; higher is better.

Technical specifications RECAlpha Pure-RX Trina SolarTSM-NEG9RC.27
General
Cell type – Monocrystalline 1
Bifacial Yes 2 Yes 1
Performance
Peak power 485 Wp ✓ 2 445 Wp 1
Efficiency
Efficiency 23.3 % ✓ 2 22.3 % 1
Temperature coefficient Pmax -0.24 %/°C 2 –
Nominal operating cell temperature (NOCT) 44 °C 2 43 °C ✓ 1
Dimensions & weight
Max. snow load 7,000 Pa ✓ 2 5,400 Pa 1
Fire class Class C 2 –
Width 1,205 mm 2 1,134 mm 1
Height 1,728 mm 2 1,762 mm 1
Depth 30 mm 2 30 mm 1
Weight 22.7 kg 2 21 kg ✓ 1
Warranty & lifespan
First-year degradation – 1 % 1
Annual degradation 0.25 % ✓ 2 0.4 % 1
Performance warranty 25 years 2 30 years ✓ 1
Output at end of warranty 92 % ✓ 2 87.4 % 1
Product warranty 20 years ✓ 2 15 years 1

Sources

  1. Trina Solar Vertex S+ TSM-NEG9RC.27 Datasheet, TSM_EN_2023_D (tekst herkend met OCR) — Trina Solar Co.,Ltd. · accessed 29 Sept 2026
  2. REC Alpha Pure-RX, 10.80.40.90/60-21-SD-MP — REC Solar PTE. LTD. · accessed 29 Sept 2026