Solar inverters · Compare

GoodWe GW15K-ET-20 vs SolaX X3-MIC-15K-G2

AC power: GoodWe GW15K-ET-20 15 kW, SolaX X3-MIC-15K-G2 15 kW. The SolaX X3-MIC-15K-G2 is better on 6 of 10 comparable points.

Who wins where

  • GoodWe GW15K-ET-20
  • SolaX X3-MIC-15K-G2
PerformanceEfficiencyElectricalConnectivity & smartDimensions & weight
Performance: GoodWe GW15K-ET-20 92, SolaX X3-MIC-15K-G2 79; Efficiency: GoodWe GW15K-ET-20 68, SolaX X3-MIC-15K-G2 82; Electrical: GoodWe GW15K-ET-20 58, SolaX X3-MIC-15K-G2 79; Connectivity & smart: GoodWe GW15K-ET-20 68, SolaX X3-MIC-15K-G2 18; Dimensions & weight: GoodWe GW15K-ET-20 24, SolaX X3-MIC-15K-G2 53

Biggest differences

FactGW15K-ET-20X3-MIC-15K-G2
Max. input current per MPPT16 A32 A
MPP trackers32
Weight25 kg18 kg
Max. PV array power24 kWp30 kWp
MPPT voltage max.850 V980 V
All specifications ↓

Score per area = position (0–100) relative to all 238 models in this category; higher is better.

Technical specifications GoodWeGW15K-ET-20 SolaXX3-MIC-15K-G2
Performance
AC power 15 kW 1 15 kW 2
Max. PV array power 24 kWp 1 30 kWp ✓ 3
MPP trackers 3 ✓ 1 2 3
Efficiency
Max. efficiency 98.2 % 1 98.3 % ✓ 3
European efficiency 97.5 % 1 97.8 % ✓ 3
Electrical
MPPT voltage min. 120 V 1 120 V 3
MPPT voltage max. 850 V 1 980 V ✓ 3
Max. input current per MPPT 16 A 1 32 A ✓ 3
Phases 3 1 3 2
Connectivity & smart
Hybrid (battery-ready) Yes ✓ 1 No 2
Backup power Yes 1 –
Wi-Fi / monitoring Yes 1 –
Dimensions & weight
IP rating IP66 1 IP66 3
Width 496 mm 1 342 mm 3
Height 460 mm 1 434 mm 3
Depth 221 mm 1 156 mm 3
Weight 25 kg 1 18 kg ✓ 3

Sources

  1. ET G2 Series 6–15 kW hybrid inverter (EMEA) – datasheet, EN-EMEA V1.1 (20241022) — GoodWe Technologies Co., Ltd. · accessed 27 Sept 2026
  2. ENA Type Test Register (inverters) — Energy Networks Association (ENA) · accessed 27 Sept 2026
  3. X3-MIC G2, V3.1 — SolaX Power · accessed 29 Sept 2026