Exinda XDASH09C3A vs JNOD JMU70HC
SCOP (35 °C): Exinda XDASH09C3A 5.02, JNOD JMU70HC 4.79. The Exinda XDASH09C3A is better on 9 of 13 comparable points.
Who wins where
- Exinda XDASH09C3A
- JNOD JMU70HC
Biggest differences
| Fact | XDASH09C3A | JMU70HC |
|---|---|---|
| COP A7/W35 | 6.89 | 4.48 |
| COP A-7/W35 | 3.29 | 2.77 |
| Refrigerant charge | 0.68 kg | 0.75 kg |
| Outdoor unit sound power | 59 dB(A) | 55 dB(A) |
| Seasonal efficiency ηs 55 °C | 149.3 % | 141.7 % |
| SCOP (55 °C) | 3.81 | 3.62 |
Score per area = position (0–100) relative to all 1350 models in this category; higher is better.
| Technical specifications | ExindaXDASH09C3A | JNODJMU70HC |
|---|---|---|
| Grants & market | ||
| Boiler Upgrade Scheme | £7,500 – £9,000 | £7,500 – £9,000 |
| General | ||
| Type (source) | Air-to-water 1 | Air-to-water 1 |
| Performance | ||
| Heating capacity (A7/W35) | 7.1 kW ✓ 2 | 7.03 kW 3 |
| Rated output 35 °C | 7.1 kW 1 | 7.1 kW 1 |
| Rated output 55 °C | 7.1 kW ✓ 1 | 6.89 kW 1 |
| Efficiency | ||
| SCOP (35 °C) | 5.02 ✓ 1 | 4.79 1 |
| SCOP (55 °C) | 3.81 ✓ 1 | 3.62 1 |
| Seasonal efficiency ηs 35 °C | 197.8 % ✓ 1 | 188.7 % 1 |
| Seasonal efficiency ηs 55 °C | 149.3 % ✓ 1 | 141.7 % 1 |
| Energy label 35 °C | A, , , 2 | A, , , 3 |
| Energy label 55 °C | A, , 2 | A, , 3 |
| COP A7/W35 | 6.89 ✓ 1 | 4.48 1 |
| COP A2/W35 | 5.42 1 | – |
| COP A-7/W35 | 3.29 ✓ 1 | 2.77 1 |
| Noise | ||
| Outdoor unit sound power | 59 dB(A) 1 | 55 dB(A) ✓ 1 |
| Refrigerant | ||
| Refrigerant | R290 1 | R290 1 |
| Refrigerant GWP | 3 2 | 3 3 |
| Refrigerant charge | 0.68 kg ✓ 1 | 0.75 kg 1 |
| Electrical | ||
| Max. power input | 2.37 kW 1 | 4.14 kW 1 |
| Connectivity & smart | ||
| SG Ready | Yes 1 | Yes 1 |
Sources
- List of eligible heat pumps (BEG) — Bundesamt für Wirtschaft und Ausfuhrkontrolle (BAFA) · accessed 27 Sept 2026
- Heat Pump Keymark certificates — EHPA / DIN CERTCO (Heat Pump KEYMARK) · accessed 29 Sept 2026
- Heat Pump Keymark certificates — EHPA / DIN CERTCO (Heat Pump KEYMARK) · accessed 29 Sept 2026