CANDY CY-18TAIN/CY-18TAOUT vs Gree GWH18AAD-K6DNA4E
SEER (cooling): CANDY CY-18TAIN/CY-18TAOUT 6.3, Gree GWH18AAD-K6DNA4E 6.4. The Gree GWH18AAD-K6DNA4E is better on 4 of 7 comparable points.
Who wins where
- CANDY CY-18TAIN/CY-18TAOUT
- Gree GWH18AAD-K6DNA4E
Biggest differences
| Fact | CY-18TAIN/CY-18TAOUT | GWH18AAD-K6DNA4E |
|---|---|---|
| Heating capacity | 2.9 kW | 3.7 kW |
Score per area = position (0–100) relative to all 400 models in this category; higher is better.
| Technical specifications | CANDYCY-18TAIN/CY-18TAOUT | GreeGWH18AAD-K6DNA4E |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ||
| Cooling capacity | 4.6 kW 1 | 4.6 kW 2 |
| Heating capacity | 2.9 kW 1 | 3.7 kW ✓ 2 |
| Efficiency | ||
| SEER (cooling) | 6.3 1 | 6.4 ✓ 2 |
| SCOP (heating) | 4 1 | 4 2 |
| Energy label cooling | A, , 1 | A, , 2 |
| Energy label heating | A, 1 | A, 2 |
| Noise | ||
| Indoor unit sound power | 59 dB(A) 1 | 58 dB(A) ✓ 2 |
| Outdoor unit sound power | 64 dB(A) 1 | 63 dB(A) ✓ 2 |
| Refrigerant | ||
| Refrigerant | R32 1 | R32 2 |
| Refrigerant GWP | 675 1 | 675 2 |
Sources
- European Product Registry for Energy Labelling (EPREL) — Europese Commissie · accessed Oct 9, 2026
- European Product Registry for Energy Labelling (EPREL) — Europese Commissie · accessed Oct 9, 2026