GORENJE TITAN53 CJ vs LG DC18RQ UL2/DC18RQ NSK
SEER (cooling): GORENJE TITAN53 CJ 7.8, LG DC18RQ UL2/DC18RQ NSK 7. The GORENJE TITAN53 CJ is better on 3 of 7 comparable points.
Who wins where
- GORENJE TITAN53 CJ
- LG DC18RQ UL2/DC18RQ NSK
Biggest differences
| Fact | TITAN53 CJ | DC18RQ UL2/DC18RQ NSK |
|---|---|---|
| SEER (cooling) | 7.8 | 7 |
| SCOP (heating) | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| Outdoor unit sound power | 63 dB(A) | 65 dB(A) |
Score per area = position (0–100) relative to all 400 models in this category; higher is better.
| Technical specifications | GORENJETITAN53 CJ | LGDC18RQ UL2/DC18RQ NSK |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ||
| Cooling capacity | 5 kW 1 | 5 kW 2 |
| Heating capacity | 3.9 kW 1 | 3.9 kW 2 |
| Efficiency | ||
| SEER (cooling) | 7.8 ✓ 1 | 7 2 |
| SCOP (heating) | 4.6 ✓ 1 | 4.3 2 |
| Energy label cooling | A, , 1 | A, , 2 |
| Energy label heating | A, , 1 | A, 2 |
| Noise | ||
| Indoor unit sound power | 60 dB(A) 1 | 60 dB(A) 2 |
| Outdoor unit sound power | 63 dB(A) ✓ 1 | 65 dB(A) 2 |
| Refrigerant | ||
| Refrigerant | R32 1 | R32 2 |
| Refrigerant GWP | 675 1 | 675 2 |
Sources
- European Product Registry for Energy Labelling (EPREL) — Europese Commissie · accessed 09 Oct 2026
- European Product Registry for Energy Labelling (EPREL) — Europese Commissie · accessed 09 Oct 2026