Home batteries · Compare

GoodWe LX F22.4-H-20 vs Sungrow SBR256

Usable capacity: GoodWe LX F22.4-H-20 22.4 kWh, Sungrow SBR256 25.6 kWh. The Sungrow SBR256 is better on 2 of 5 comparable points.

Who wins where

  • GoodWe LX F22.4-H-20
  • Sungrow SBR256
PerformanceEfficiencyDimensions & weight
Performance: GoodWe LX F22.4-H-20 83, Sungrow SBR256 89; Efficiency: GoodWe LX F22.4-H-20 76, Sungrow SBR256 76; Dimensions & weight: GoodWe LX F22.4-H-20 45, Sungrow SBR256 43

Biggest differences

FactLX F22.4-H-20SBR256
Usable capacity22.4 kWh25.6 kWh
Nominal capacity22.4 kWh25.6 kWh
Weight256 kg279 kg
All specifications ↓

Score per area = position (0–100) relative to all 130 models in this category; higher is better.

Technical specifications GoodWeLX F22.4-H-20 SungrowSBR256
General
Cell chemistry LFP 1 LFP 2
Performance
Usable capacity 22.4 kWh 1 25.6 kWh ✓ 2
Nominal capacity 22.4 kWh 3 25.6 kWh ✓ 3
Expandable up to 230 kWh 1 –
Charge power (continuous) 15.68 kW 1 –
Discharge power (continuous) 15.68 kW 1 –
Efficiency
Depth of discharge 100 % 1 100 % 2
Electrical
Backup power Yes 1 –
Dimensions & weight
IP rating IP55 1 IP55 2
Min. operating temperature -20 °C 1 -20 °C 2
Width 600 mm 1 625 mm 2
Height 1,339 mm 1 1,195 mm 2
Depth 380 mm 1 330 mm 2
Weight 256 kg ✓ 1 279 kg 2
Warranty & lifespan
Warranty – 10 years 2

Sources

  1. Lynx F G2 Series, GoodWe-Single page-20250124-EN-V2.1 — GoodWe · accessed 29 Sept 2026
  2. Hochspannungs-LFP-Batterie SBR096/128/160/192/224/256, 14 — Sungrow Power Supply Co., Ltd. · accessed 29 Sept 2026
  3. CEC approved solar batteries (Australia) — Clean Energy Regulator (Australian Government), CC BY 4.0 · accessed 29 Sept 2026